<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Love and to Hate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2006/11/30/to-love-and-to-hate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2006/11/30/to-love-and-to-hate/</link>
	<description>A funny guy saying funny things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2006/11/30/to-love-and-to-hate/comment-page-1/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 23:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2006/11/30/to-love-and-to-hate/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been reading Pitchfork for a couple years now, but either I&#039;ve gotten much more staid in my music choices (which I&#039;m not doubting) or Pitchfork is just a steaming pile of wasted web space now. I&#039;ve don&#039;t have a problem with music-snobbery, but it seems like these days you have to have a stupid name and make noise to even be mentioned in Pitchfork.

I realize that this isn&#039;t true when it comes to the rankings you&#039;re speaking of, as far as perfect 10&#039;s go, because those listed are pretty established, mainstream indie/punk bands for the most part, but I always know where to get news about the latest Xiu Xiu Mau Mau Dismemberment Plans.

As Lambchop put it on their latest album, &quot;You see your Pitchfork, Our rock saviors; I&#039;m sorry I still prefer Jim Nabors&quot;. My sentiment exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been reading Pitchfork for a couple years now, but either I&#8217;ve gotten much more staid in my music choices (which I&#8217;m not doubting) or Pitchfork is just a steaming pile of wasted web space now. I&#8217;ve don&#8217;t have a problem with music-snobbery, but it seems like these days you have to have a stupid name and make noise to even be mentioned in Pitchfork.</p>
<p>I realize that this isn&#8217;t true when it comes to the rankings you&#8217;re speaking of, as far as perfect 10&#8242;s go, because those listed are pretty established, mainstream indie/punk bands for the most part, but I always know where to get news about the latest Xiu Xiu Mau Mau Dismemberment Plans.</p>
<p>As Lambchop put it on their latest album, &#8220;You see your Pitchfork, Our rock saviors; I&#8217;m sorry I still prefer Jim Nabors&#8221;. My sentiment exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
