Obama Reneges on FISA
Obama came out a few days ago and reversed his position on the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) bill that’s before the Senate right now. This bill would give telecommunication companies (phone and/or Internet service providers a la AT&T) retroactive immunity from prosecution for breaking the law.
Basically, the Bush administration went to the telecoms and said, “we’d like the power to monitor people’s phone calls and emails without ever asking for permission.” There were many rules in place that would allow the administration to do this with permission, but I guess they didn’t want to bother with all that messy paperwork. Most of the telecoms said yes … I’m pretty sure one of the major firms refused, but don’t quote me on that.
So now, there’s a bill before the Senate that will change the law to say that spying on us without permission was okay, it will be okay in the future, and the telecoms were justified in breaking the law when the president asked them to. Obama has spoken strongly against this legislation in the past, but just last week he changed his mind, presumably so he won’t look soft on terrorism.
Russ Feingold isn’t taking this lying down (see the awesome video below). He’s continuing to fight the bill, and this week they managed to push the vote back past the July 4th weekend. If you think it’s bullshit that our presidential candidate would support this violation of our privacy, please join this group on his website that’s urging him to change his mind. I’m sure there are people you can call, but I’ll give you that info when I get it. And Harmon … I know you’re an Obama man … if you have any suggestions, please contribute!










July 2nd, 2008 at 7:20 am
I don’t love the situation, but:
* The bill does not give immunity from prosecution. It gives immunity from civil suits. It’s lame to give even that, but it leaves the option to prosecute open.
* The bill includes judicial oversight of the wiretapping. I don’t know details (Olbermann hasn’t gone into those), but what I gather is that the non-immunity-related bits are a refinement around the spirit of the FISA courts.
Obama claims he supports this one because they got judicial oversight back in, and it’s better than letting the FISA courts lapse. I don’t love it 100%, but if it helps him get elected (where he’ll have the clearance and investigative power to find out what happened, and prosecute as necessary), I’ll swallow the pill for a few months.