<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Must They Keep Toying With Me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/</link>
	<description>A funny guy saying funny things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6499</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6499</guid>
		<description>Dunno if you get notified of new replies, but this was the best place to put this, and I thought you&#039;d enjoy it (and/or be greatly annoyed by it): http://wigu.livejournal.com/165176.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dunno if you get notified of new replies, but this was the best place to put this, and I thought you&#8217;d enjoy it (and/or be greatly annoyed by it): <a href="http://wigu.livejournal.com/165176.html" rel="nofollow">http://wigu.livejournal.com/165176.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6048</guid>
		<description>Sadly, this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=7242528&amp;version=2&amp;locale=EN-US&amp;layoutCode=TSTY&amp;pageId=3.2.1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Fox article&lt;/a&gt; is the only source I can find to confirm the firing... but, assuming for the moment that Fox didn&#039;t totally screw this up (a big assumption, I know)... not only is the bigfoot thing a hoax, but one of the guys who perpetrated the hoax got canned for it. I hope they didn&#039;t/won&#039;t make enough money off of it to make up for that; it&#039;d be nice for hoaxers to lose for a change, instead of get nothing but gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, this <a href="http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=7242528&amp;version=2&amp;locale=EN-US&amp;layoutCode=TSTY&amp;pageId=3.2.1" rel="nofollow">Fox article</a> is the only source I can find to confirm the firing&#8230; but, assuming for the moment that Fox didn&#8217;t totally screw this up (a big assumption, I know)&#8230; not only is the bigfoot thing a hoax, but one of the guys who perpetrated the hoax got canned for it. I hope they didn&#8217;t/won&#8217;t make enough money off of it to make up for that; it&#8217;d be nice for hoaxers to lose for a change, instead of get nothing but gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6038</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6038</guid>
		<description>This is a better way of saying what I was trying to say: http://cectic.com/036.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a better way of saying what I was trying to say: <a href="http://cectic.com/036.html" rel="nofollow">http://cectic.com/036.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6035</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 06:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6035</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I may have spoken too soon on that particular example: http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/May/02050802.asp

It&#039;s still a maybe, and some day element 122 *will* be discovered, it just *might* not be naturally occurring/long-lived like the early reports claimed.

As for the properties... I&#039;m not sure what they&#039;d be. Elements have similar properties based on what energy level their outermost electrons occupy, with blocks on the periodic defined by those energy levels (s block, p block, d block, f block being the ones that all known elements fit into). 122 would be the first-discovered element of the *g* block, so, though physicists could probably tell you expected properties for that block, I don&#039;t know what they are. A lot of the rarer f-block elements are used for specialized purposes in electronics (and, again, I don&#039;t really know exactly what properties of those elements are so useful in electronics, but they&#039;re needed in trace amounts to enable the technology we have)...... so, in other words, if 122 turns out to be real (or we find another element in the predicted &quot;island of stability,&quot; where very heavy/man-made elements start to become stable enough to work with), it could open up some new sort of device that had previously been impossible (and possibly unimagined). And that&#039;s just awesome.

And a waterwheel generates more energy than the operator puts in, but it ultimately is using solar power (from evaporation of the water to move it uphill). That doesn&#039;t count as free energy in the way Jeff meant... but you probably knew that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I may have spoken too soon on that particular example: <a href="http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/May/02050802.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2008/May/02050802.asp</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s still a maybe, and some day element 122 *will* be discovered, it just *might* not be naturally occurring/long-lived like the early reports claimed.</p>
<p>As for the properties&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure what they&#8217;d be. Elements have similar properties based on what energy level their outermost electrons occupy, with blocks on the periodic defined by those energy levels (s block, p block, d block, f block being the ones that all known elements fit into). 122 would be the first-discovered element of the *g* block, so, though physicists could probably tell you expected properties for that block, I don&#8217;t know what they are. A lot of the rarer f-block elements are used for specialized purposes in electronics (and, again, I don&#8217;t really know exactly what properties of those elements are so useful in electronics, but they&#8217;re needed in trace amounts to enable the technology we have)&#8230;&#8230; so, in other words, if 122 turns out to be real (or we find another element in the predicted &#8220;island of stability,&#8221; where very heavy/man-made elements start to become stable enough to work with), it could open up some new sort of device that had previously been impossible (and possibly unimagined). And that&#8217;s just awesome.</p>
<p>And a waterwheel generates more energy than the operator puts in, but it ultimately is using solar power (from evaporation of the water to move it uphill). That doesn&#8217;t count as free energy in the way Jeff meant&#8230; but you probably knew that :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6034</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6034</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t a waterwheel generate more energy than it takes to run? Who&#039;s the president now, bitches?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t a waterwheel generate more energy than it takes to run? Who&#8217;s the president now, bitches?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6030</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6030</guid>
		<description>And P.S. I checked the spam filter and you were nowhere to be found ... if it happens again please let me know!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And P.S. I checked the spam filter and you were nowhere to be found &#8230; if it happens again please let me know!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6029</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6029</guid>
		<description>Properties? What kinds of properties? This could be just the thing I&#039;m looking for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Properties? What kinds of properties? This could be just the thing I&#8217;m looking for!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6024</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6024</guid>
		<description>Hmm, what the heck? I wrote a comment on this yesterday, but it&#039;s nowhere to be seen. Was I screened out as spam???

ANYHOO, basically... there&#039;s plenty that&#039;s still mysterious, but two guys in California pre-announcing a photo op aren&#039;t the ones who are going to present it to you. I recommend starting somewhere like newscientist.com or science.slashdot.com. Both over-sensationalize things occasionally (and get things flat-out wrong from time to time), but at least it&#039;s based in reality, which is way more mystery-filled than anyone&#039;s imagination... and occasionally there&#039;s even a payoff, when we find something new and totally awesome.

For example... did you know they might have found a new class of elements, past all the radioactive stuff and not all that radioactive, that might be naturally occurring? If confirmed, and we find a way to make them in larger quantities than the one-in-a-bazillion they are thought to exist at naturally, it could result in completely new materials, with properties that... well, that we have a pretty good idea about already, actually, thanks to physics and chemistry predictions, but probably some things we haven&#039;t figured out yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, what the heck? I wrote a comment on this yesterday, but it&#8217;s nowhere to be seen. Was I screened out as spam???</p>
<p>ANYHOO, basically&#8230; there&#8217;s plenty that&#8217;s still mysterious, but two guys in California pre-announcing a photo op aren&#8217;t the ones who are going to present it to you. I recommend starting somewhere like newscientist.com or science.slashdot.com. Both over-sensationalize things occasionally (and get things flat-out wrong from time to time), but at least it&#8217;s based in reality, which is way more mystery-filled than anyone&#8217;s imagination&#8230; and occasionally there&#8217;s even a payoff, when we find something new and totally awesome.</p>
<p>For example&#8230; did you know they might have found a new class of elements, past all the radioactive stuff and not all that radioactive, that might be naturally occurring? If confirmed, and we find a way to make them in larger quantities than the one-in-a-bazillion they are thought to exist at naturally, it could result in completely new materials, with properties that&#8230; well, that we have a pretty good idea about already, actually, thanks to physics and chemistry predictions, but probably some things we haven&#8217;t figured out yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmon</title>
		<link>http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/2008/08/14/why-must-they-keep-toying-with-me/comment-page-1/#comment-6022</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeffreydinsmore.com/?p=547#comment-6022</guid>
		<description>There are plenty of places to look for &quot;the possibility that maybe, just maybe, there are things going on in the universe that we don’t fully understand.&quot; A few places to watch for some of it:
 * http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod
 * http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns (they have tons of stuff that doesn&#039;t pan out, too, but I don&#039;t think they&#039;ve run anything as bas as an &quot;ohmygod those physics eggheads were wrong, perpetual motion works!&quot; article yet)
 * http://science.slashdot.org/ (they sometimes misinterpret what the science means, but they&#039;re mostly good for pulling out the cool stuff)

Yes, I&#039;m a skeptic jerk ruining everyone&#039;s fun, but I wouldn&#039;t hold my breath over this bigfoot reveal. Watch real science for the exciting stuff that we don&#039;t understand yet, there&#039;s tons of it all the time... and, even better, occasionally someone figures some of it out!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of places to look for &#8220;the possibility that maybe, just maybe, there are things going on in the universe that we don’t fully understand.&#8221; A few places to watch for some of it:<br />
 * <a href="http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod" rel="nofollow">http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod</a><br />
 * <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/home.ns</a> (they have tons of stuff that doesn&#8217;t pan out, too, but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ve run anything as bas as an &#8220;ohmygod those physics eggheads were wrong, perpetual motion works!&#8221; article yet)<br />
 * <a href="http://science.slashdot.org/" rel="nofollow">http://science.slashdot.org/</a> (they sometimes misinterpret what the science means, but they&#8217;re mostly good for pulling out the cool stuff)</p>
<p>Yes, I&#8217;m a skeptic jerk ruining everyone&#8217;s fun, but I wouldn&#8217;t hold my breath over this bigfoot reveal. Watch real science for the exciting stuff that we don&#8217;t understand yet, there&#8217;s tons of it all the time&#8230; and, even better, occasionally someone figures some of it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
